Turnball v Neilson Active Holidays Ltd [2024] EWHC 3696 (Admlty) (10 December 2024)

Turnball v Neilson Active Holidays Ltd [2024] EWHC 3696 (Admlty) (10 December 2024)

The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the accident was caused by a defect in the fridge lid or by any breach of duty by the defendant. The fridge lid was standard, certified, and not shown to be inherently unsafe by local or international standards. The defendant's duty of reasonable skill and care was not breached, as the risk of injury was rare, warnings were provided, and no evidence established a failure in risk assessment or maintenance. Local Greek workplace safety regulations did not apply to the yacht as a pleasure craft. The accident was most likely caused by inadvertence in operation, not by any actionable defect or negligence.

Citation
[2024] EWHC 3696 (Admlty)
Parties
Claimant: Sara Turnball; Defendant: Neilson Active Holidays Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 December 2024
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury/contractual Liability (admiralty) / Liability Trial (quantum Reserved)
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Breach of Contract, Package Travel Regulations, Local Standards, Personal Injury, Risk Assessment
Tort Contract Travel Law Admiralty Negligence Breach of Contract Package Travel Regulations Local Standards +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sara Turnball

Claimant

Neilson Active Holidays Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury/contractual Liability (admiralty) / Liability Trial (quantum Reserved)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant failed to exercise reasonable skill and care in provision of the yacht and its equipment under contract and/or in negligence
  2. 2 Whether the fridge lid was defective or inherently unsafe
  3. 3 Whether local Greek safety standards were breached or determinative

Ratio Decidendi

The claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the accident was caused by a defect in the fridge lid or by any breach of duty by the defendant. The fridge lid was standard, certified, and not shown to be inherently unsafe by local or international standards. The defendant's duty of reasonable skill and care was not breached, as the risk of injury was rare, warnings were provided, and no evidence established a failure in risk assessment or maintenance. Local Greek workplace safety regulations did not apply to the yacht as a pleasure craft. The accident was most likely caused by inadvertence in operation, not by any actionable defect or negligence.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim for liability dismissed; quantum not determined.
  • No order as to damages.