Bokhari v Harb & Ors
The court found that the codicil was never executed by the Testator but was concocted by the Defendants, attesting witnesses, and Mr Gheath in or shortly before October 2000. The evidence of execution was not credible, and the absence of reference to the codicil by the Testator and delayed disclosure by the Defendants further undermined its authenticity.
- Parties
- Claimant: Iftikhar Hussain Bokhari; Defendant: Nelly Harb; Defendant: Dr Khalil Harb; Defendant: Samir Khalil Harb
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Probate Action / Judgment
- Outcome
- Probate of the codicil refused; appointment of Mr Phillips as executor terminated.
- Legal Topics
- Validity of Codicil, Execution of Testamentary Documents, Appointment of Executors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Iftikhar Hussain Bokhari
Claimant
Nelly Harb
Defendant
Dr Khalil Harb
Defendant
Samir Khalil Harb
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Probate Action / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the alleged codicil dated 11 January 1990 was duly executed by the Testator
- 2 Whether the codicil should be admitted to probate
- 3 Whether the appointment of Mr Phillips as executor should be terminated
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the codicil was never executed by the Testator but was concocted by the Defendants, attesting witnesses, and Mr Gheath in or shortly before October 2000. The evidence of execution was not credible, and the absence of reference to the codicil by the Testator and delayed disclosure by the Defendants further undermined its authenticity.
Court Disposition
Probate of the codicil refused; appointment of Mr Phillips as executor terminated.
Orders
- Probate of the codicil dated 11 January 1990 is refused.
- Appointment of Mr Phillips as executor is terminated.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment