Photobooth Props Limited & Anor v NEPBH Ltd & Ors
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the transaction was for the entirety of the business, including all relevant assets and intellectual property, and that the Defendants made representations to that effect which became terms of the contract. The Defendants breached both express and implied terms by competing with the Claimants and infringing copyright in the transferred designs. The Defendants were found jointly liable as joint tortfeasors. The Defendants' evidence was insufficient to rebut the Claimants' case.
- Parties
- Claimant: Photobooth Props Limited; Claimant: Lily’s Prints Limited; Defendant: NEPBH Ltd; Defendant: Quinn UK Limited; Defendant: Claire Quinn; Defendant: Reece Quinn; Defendant: Michael Quinn; Defendant: Your Print Supplies Limited; Defendant: Your Photobooth Props Limited; Defendant: Michael Connor Quinn
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Intellectual Property / Final Judgment on Liability; Quantum and Remedies to Be Determined at a Later Hearing
- Outcome
- Liability judgment for the Claimants; damages and quantum to be determined at a later hearing; costs awarded to Claimants subject to summary assessment; permission to apply for IPEC costs cap to be lifted.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Infringement, Breach of Contract, Misrepresentation, Joint Tortfeasorship, Summary Judgment, Costs Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Photobooth Props Limited
Claimant
Lily’s Prints Limited
Claimant
NEPBH Ltd
Defendant
Quinn UK Limited
Defendant
Claire Quinn
Defendant
Reece Quinn
Defendant
Michael Quinn
Defendant
Your Print Supplies Limited
Defendant
Your Photobooth Props Limited
Defendant
Michael Connor Quinn
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Intellectual Property / Final Judgment on Liability; Quantum and Remedies to Be Determined at a Later Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transaction between the parties transferred the entirety of the printing business and associated intellectual property to the Claimants
- 2 Whether the Defendants made false or fraudulent representations regarding the assets and rights transferred
- 3 Whether the Defendants infringed copyright and breached contract terms post-sale
Ratio Decidendi
The court found on the balance of probabilities that the transaction was for the entirety of the business, including all relevant assets and intellectual property, and that the Defendants made representations to that effect which became terms of the contract. The Defendants breached both express and implied terms by competing with the Claimants and infringing copyright in the transferred designs. The Defendants were found jointly liable as joint tortfeasors. The Defendants' evidence was insufficient to rebut the Claimants' case.
Court Disposition
Liability judgment for the Claimants; damages and quantum to be determined at a later hearing; costs awarded to Claimants subject to summary assessment; permission to apply for IPEC costs cap to be lifted.
Orders
- Enquiry as to damages to take place
- Claimants awarded costs (other than those already ordered), to be summarily assessed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment