Network Homes Ltd v Harlow
Clause 3.19 of the tenancy agreement, when interpreted in context and with reference to its express inclusion of improvement work, pest eradication, and repossession, grants the landlord a right of access for improvement works. The judge at first instance erred in limiting the scope of clause 3.19 to essential maintenance. The appeal is allowed, and Network Homes is entitled to access for the purpose of replacing the front door.
- Parties
- Appellant: Network Homes Limited; Respondent: Maurice Harlow
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Tenancy Agreements, Right of Access, Improvement Works, Quiet Enjoyment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Network Homes Limited
Appellant
Maurice Harlow
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tenancy agreement grants the landlord a right of access for improvement works
- 2 Proper interpretation of clauses 2.2 and 3.19 of the tenancy agreement
- 3 Whether an implied right of access exists for improvement works
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 3.19 of the tenancy agreement, when interpreted in context and with reference to its express inclusion of improvement work, pest eradication, and repossession, grants the landlord a right of access for improvement works. The judge at first instance erred in limiting the scope of clause 3.19 to essential maintenance. The appeal is allowed, and Network Homes is entitled to access for the purpose of replacing the front door.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Network Homes is entitled to access Flat 25 Rydal Court to replace the front door with a certified fire rated door.
- The parties are encouraged to resolve practical arrangements for installation, considering Mr Harlow's needs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment