Express Medicals Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd [2004] EWHC 1185 (TCC) (28 May 2004)

Express Medicals Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd [2004] EWHC 1185 (TCC) (28 May 2004)

The information sought to be obliterated (identities of staff, clients, and business plans) is confidential and commercially sensitive. The claimant does not require access to this information for a fair trial of the preliminary issue of liability, as the relevant qualifications and numbers of staff are disclosed. The application for inspection of the obliterated information is a fishing expedition and not necessary for the fair disposal of the case. The balance of justice weighs heavily in favour of preserving confidentiality.

Citation
[2004] EWHC 1185 (TCC)
Parties
Claimant: Express Medicals Limited; Defendant: Network Rail Infrastructure Limited; Third Party (not a Party to Proceedings, Represented for Confidentiality Interests): Nationwide Healthcare Connections Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Application Under Civil Procedure Rules Part 31.19(5) / Interlocutory Application for Inspection of Documents (preliminary Issue: Liability)
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Disclosure and Inspection of Documents, Confidentiality in Tender Processes, Obliteration of Confidential Information, Tendering and Procurement Obligations
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Public Procurement Disclosure and Inspection of Documents Confidentiality in Tender Processes Obliteration of Confidential Information Tendering and Procurement Obligations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Express Medicals Limited

Claimant

Network Rail Infrastructure Limited

Defendant

Nationwide Healthcare Connections Limited

Third Party (not a Party to Proceedings, Represented for Confidentiality Interests)

Procedural Posture

Application Under Civil Procedure Rules Part 31.19(5) / Interlocutory Application for Inspection of Documents (preliminary Issue: Liability)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to inspect documents disclosed by the defendant with obliterations of confidential information (staff identities, client identities, business plans)
  2. 2 Whether the obliterations are justified on grounds of confidentiality and relevance under the Civil Procedure Rules

Ratio Decidendi

The information sought to be obliterated (identities of staff, clients, and business plans) is confidential and commercially sensitive. The claimant does not require access to this information for a fair trial of the preliminary issue of liability, as the relevant qualifications and numbers of staff are disclosed. The application for inspection of the obliterated information is a fishing expedition and not necessary for the fair disposal of the case. The balance of justice weighs heavily in favour of preserving confidentiality.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • Claimant's application for inspection of obliterated information is refused.
  • Obliterations of confidential information (staff identities, client identities, business plans, and specified pricing passages) are to remain for the trial of the preliminary issue.