Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd v Williams & Anor [2018] EWCA Civ 1514 (03 July 2018)
Encroachment of Japanese knotweed and its rhizomes from Network Rail's land onto the claimants' properties constitutes an actionable private nuisance because it interferes with the amenity and utility of the land, even in the absence of physical damage. The presence of knotweed imposes a burden on the landowner, diminishes the ability to use and enjoy the property, and is sufficient to found liability in nuisance. Damages for loss of amenity and residual diminution in value after treatment are recoverable.
- Citation
- [2018] EWCA Civ 1514
- Parties
- Appellant: Network Rail Infrastructure Limited; First Respondent: Stephen Williams; Second Respondent: Robin Waistell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Cardiff County Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; Recorder's decision upheld but for different reasons.
- Legal Topics
- Private Nuisance, Encroachment, Amenity Value, Japanese Knotweed, Diminution in Value, Remedies in Nuisance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Network Rail Infrastructure Limited
Appellant
Stephen Williams
First Respondent
Robin Waistell
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Cardiff County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the encroachment of Japanese knotweed and its rhizomes from Network Rail's land onto the claimants' properties constitutes an actionable private nuisance without proof of physical damage
- 2 Whether diminution in value and loss of amenity from the presence of Japanese knotweed is actionable in nuisance
- 3 Whether the Recorder was correct to award damages for residual diminution in value after treatment
Ratio Decidendi
Encroachment of Japanese knotweed and its rhizomes from Network Rail's land onto the claimants' properties constitutes an actionable private nuisance because it interferes with the amenity and utility of the land, even in the absence of physical damage. The presence of knotweed imposes a burden on the landowner, diminishes the ability to use and enjoy the property, and is sufficient to found liability in nuisance. Damages for loss of amenity and residual diminution in value after treatment are recoverable.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; Recorder's decision upheld but for different reasons.
Orders
- Damages of £4,320 to each respondent for treatment and insurance-backed guarantee
- Damages of £300 to Mr Waistell for survey costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment