Express Medicals Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd

Express Medicals Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd

The information sought to be inspected by the claimant, including the identities of staff, clients, and business plans, is confidential and commercially sensitive. The claimant has not demonstrated that inspection of this information is necessary for the fair trial of the preliminary issue. The balance of justice weighs heavily in favour of preserving confidentiality, and the obliterations are justified.

Parties
Claimant: Express Medicals Limited; Defendant: Network Rail Infrastructure Limited; Interested Party: Nationwide Healthcare Connections Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 May 2004
Procedural Posture
Application Under Civil Procedure Rules Part 31.19(5) / Interlocutory Application for Inspection of Documents
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Disclosure of Documents, Confidential Information, Tender Process, Inspection of Documents
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Confidentiality Disclosure of Documents Confidential Information Tender Process Inspection of Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Express Medicals Limited

Claimant

Network Rail Infrastructure Limited

Defendant

Nationwide Healthcare Connections Limited

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Application Under Civil Procedure Rules Part 31.19(5) / Interlocutory Application for Inspection of Documents

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to inspect documents disclosed by the defendant with obliterations relating to confidential information such as staff identities, client identities, and business plans.
  2. 2 Whether the obliterations made by the defendant and sought by Healthcare are justified on grounds of confidentiality and relevance.

Ratio Decidendi

The information sought to be inspected by the claimant, including the identities of staff, clients, and business plans, is confidential and commercially sensitive. The claimant has not demonstrated that inspection of this information is necessary for the fair trial of the preliminary issue. The balance of justice weighs heavily in favour of preserving confidentiality, and the obliterations are justified.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The claimant's application for inspection of the obliterated information is refused.
  • Three passages relating to pricing are to be obliterated for the trial of the preliminary issue.