Neumans LLP (A Firm) v Andrew Andronikou & Ors
Solicitors' fees incurred by a company in unsuccessfully defending a winding up petition are not payable as an expense of an out of court administration under the Insolvency Rules 1986, but may be payable as an expense of the subsequent liquidation. The court has no jurisdiction, under statute or inherent powers, to order otherwise.
- Parties
- Appellant: Neumans LLP; Respondents: Andrew Andronikou & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Administration Expenses, Liquidation Expenses, Priority of Payments, Jurisdiction Under Insolvency Rules, Costs Orders, Solicitors' Fees in Insolvency
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Neumans LLP
Appellant
Andrew Andronikou & Ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether solicitors' fees for defending a winding up petition are payable as an expense of an out of court administration
- 2 Whether the court has jurisdiction to order payment of such fees as an administration expense
- 3 Whether the Insolvency Rules 1986 provide for such payment
Ratio Decidendi
Solicitors' fees incurred by a company in unsuccessfully defending a winding up petition are not payable as an expense of an out of court administration under the Insolvency Rules 1986, but may be payable as an expense of the subsequent liquidation. The court has no jurisdiction, under statute or inherent powers, to order otherwise.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment