Manley & Anor v New Forest District Council [2007] EWHC 3188 (Admin) (06 November 2007)

Manley & Anor v New Forest District Council [2007] EWHC 3188 (Admin) (06 November 2007)

The appellant failed to demonstrate that the best practicable means were used to abate the noise. Remedies suggested by the council were practicable, and the appellant had ample opportunity to address them. Financial implications did not render the remedies impracticable. No error of law was found in the Crown Court's decision.

Citation
[2007] EWHC 3188 (Admin)
Parties
Appellants: Albert and Jennifer Manley; Respondent: New Forest District Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 November 2007
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Final Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed; application to amend case stated refused; permission to appeal denied
Legal Topics
Statutory Nuisance, Noise Abatement, Appeals Procedure, Best Practicable Means
Environmental Law Administrative Law Statutory Nuisance Noise Abatement Appeals Procedure Best Practicable Means

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Albert and Jennifer Manley

Appellants

New Forest District Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant demonstrated that the best practicable means were used to prevent or counteract the effects of the statutory nuisance (noise)
  2. 2 Whether procedural unfairness occurred regarding the remedy suggestions
  3. 3 Whether financial implications rendered remedies impracticable

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to demonstrate that the best practicable means were used to abate the noise. Remedies suggested by the council were practicable, and the appellant had ample opportunity to address them. Financial implications did not render the remedies impracticable. No error of law was found in the Crown Court's decision.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed; application to amend case stated refused; permission to appeal denied

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Application to amend case stated refused