JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 2179 (QB) (30 July 2012)

JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 2179 (QB) (30 July 2012)

The court approved the consent orders staying the actions and discharging substantive injunctions, but continued the anonymity and confidentiality orders as necessary and proportionate derogations from open justice to protect the claimants' and associated parties' private information, in the absence of sufficient public interest to justify identification.

Citation
[2012] EWHC 2179 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: JIH; Defendant: NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LIMITED; Claimant: FREDERICK GOODWIN (formerly MNB); Claimant: ETK; Interested Party: VBN; Claimant: TSE; Claimant: ELP; Claimant: MJN; Claimant: XJA; Claimant: NOM
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 July 2012
Procedural Posture
Civil / Case Management Conference and Approval of Consent Orders Following Interim Injunctions
Outcome
Actions stayed by consent; substantive injunctions discharged; anonymity and confidentiality orders continued.
Legal Topics
Interim Injunctions, Non Disclosure Orders, Anonymity Orders, Open Justice, Freedom of Expression, Case Management, Human Rights
Media Law Privacy Law Civil Procedure Interim Injunctions Non Disclosure Orders Anonymity Orders Open Justice Freedom of Expression +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

JIH

Claimant

NEWS GROUP NEWSPAPERS LIMITED

Defendant

FREDERICK GOODWIN (formerly MNB)

Claimant

ETK

Claimant

VBN

Interested Party

TSE

Claimant

ELP

Claimant

MJN

Claimant

XJA

Claimant

NOM

Claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Case Management Conference and Approval of Consent Orders Following Interim Injunctions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether interim non-disclosure and anonymity orders should be continued or discharged upon settlement of privacy actions
  2. 2 Whether derogations from open justice are justified post-settlement
  3. 3 Whether the court should approve consent orders maintaining confidentiality and anonymity

Ratio Decidendi

The court approved the consent orders staying the actions and discharging substantive injunctions, but continued the anonymity and confidentiality orders as necessary and proportionate derogations from open justice to protect the claimants' and associated parties' private information, in the absence of sufficient public interest to justify identification.

Court Disposition

Actions stayed by consent; substantive injunctions discharged; anonymity and confidentiality orders continued.

Orders

  • Actions stayed on agreed terms between parties.
  • Substantive interim injunctions restraining publication of private information discharged.