Hinsull, R (On the Application Of) v NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group

Hinsull, R (On the Application Of) v NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group

The CCG acted within its broad statutory discretion, adequately considered the sufficiency of the social care workforce, alternative community provision, and travel times, complied with the Bed Closure Test to the satisfaction of NHS England, and conducted a fair consultation. None of the grounds advanced by the...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Anna Hinsull; Defendant: NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 September 2018
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Consultation Requirements, Health Service Reconfiguration, Statutory Duties of Ccgs, Bed Closure Test, Public Consultation, Wednesbury Unreasonableness
Administrative Law Health Law Public Law Judicial Review Consultation Requirements Health Service Reconfiguration Statutory Duties of Ccgs Bed Closure Test +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anna Hinsull

Claimant

NHS Dorset Clinical Commissioning Group

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment After Substantive Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the CCG failed to have regard to the sufficiency of the social care workforce in its decision-making
  2. 2 Whether the CCG failed to adequately investigate alternative community provision before closing hospital beds (Tameside duty)
  3. 3 Whether the CCG failed to comply with the NHS England Bed Closure Test

Ratio Decidendi

The CCG acted within its broad statutory discretion, adequately considered the sufficiency of the social care workforce, alternative community provision, and travel times, complied with the Bed Closure Test to the satisfaction of NHS England, and conducted a fair consultation. None of the grounds advanced by the Claimant met the threshold for unlawfulness or Wednesbury unreasonableness. The claims for judicial review were therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed