Bridge, R v [2019] EWCA Crim 2220 (04 April 2019)

Bridge, R v [2019] EWCA Crim 2220 (04 April 2019)

The judge's conduct, directions, and comments did not cross the line into unfairness or render the conviction unsafe; the summing-up was adequate, the directions were robust and fair, and there was no merit in any of the grounds advanced for appeal.

Citation
[2019] EWCA Crim 2220
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Nicholas Bridge
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 April 2019
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
Legal Topics
Murder, Self Defence, Judicial Directions, Jury Discharge, Bad Character Evidence, Racial Bias in Jury, Judicial Intervention
Criminal Law Murder Self Defence Judicial Directions Jury Discharge Bad Character Evidence Racial Bias in Jury Judicial Intervention

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Nicholas Bridge

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge's conduct and directions rendered the conviction unsafe
  2. 2 Whether the judge's comments improperly bolstered witness credibility
  3. 3 Whether the judge's interventions undermined the defence case

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's conduct, directions, and comments did not cross the line into unfairness or render the conviction unsafe; the summing-up was adequate, the directions were robust and fair, and there was no merit in any of the grounds advanced for appeal.

Court Disposition

renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused