C Christo & Co Ltd v Christoforou & Anor [2023] EWHC 1094 (KB) (12 May 2023)

C Christo & Co Ltd v Christoforou & Anor [2023] EWHC 1094 (KB) (12 May 2023)

The application to strike out was refused because the claim was not a pure duplication of previous proceedings, there was a legitimate basis for the claim, and the relief sought was not so trivial or disproportionate as to justify strike-out. The court found no sufficient basis for Henderson v Henderson, collateral purpose, or Jameel abuse, and noted that the court retains powers to manage costs and procedure proportionately.

Citation
[2023] EWHC 1094 (KB)
Parties
Claimant: C. Christo & Co Limited; Defendant: Nicholas Christoforou; Defendant: Alexander Christoforou
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Strike Out Under CPR 3.4(2)(b)
Outcome
Application for strike-out refused
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Strike Out Applications, Confidential Information, Family Business Disputes, Costs Orders
Civil Procedure Confidential Information Injunctions Abuse of Process Strike Out Applications Family Business Disputes Costs Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C. Christo & Co Limited

Claimant

Nicholas Christoforou

Defendant

Alexander Christoforou

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application for Strike Out Under CPR 3.4(2)(b)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claim should be struck out as an abuse of process under CPR 3.4(2)(b) on grounds of Henderson v Henderson abuse, collateral purpose/vexatious conduct, or Jameel abuse

Ratio Decidendi

The application to strike out was refused because the claim was not a pure duplication of previous proceedings, there was a legitimate basis for the claim, and the relief sought was not so trivial or disproportionate as to justify strike-out. The court found no sufficient basis for Henderson v Henderson, collateral purpose, or Jameel abuse, and noted that the court retains powers to manage costs and procedure proportionately.

Court Disposition

Application for strike-out refused

Orders

  • Defendants to pay claimant's costs of the strike-out application, subject to detailed assessment.
  • Defendants to make a payment on account of costs in the sum of £50,000.