C. CHRISTO & CO LIMITED v NICHOLAS CHRISTOFOROU & Anor.

C. CHRISTO & CO LIMITED v NICHOLAS CHRISTOFOROU & Anor.

The application for strike-out was refused because the claim was not a pure duplication of previous proceedings, the company had a legitimate protectible interest, there was no clear evidence of collateral purpose abuse, and the relief sought was not so trivial as to justify strike-out under Jameel abuse. The court found the claim could be managed proportionately and that the defendants had not been ambushed or unfairly prejudiced.

Parties
Claimant: C. Christo & Co Limited; Defendant: Nicholas Christoforou; Defendant: Alexander Christoforou
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 September 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Strike Out
Outcome
Application for strike-out refused
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Confidential Information, Strike Out Applications, Injunctions
Civil Procedure Abuse of Process Confidential Information Strike Out Applications Injunctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

C. Christo & Co Limited

Claimant

Nicholas Christoforou

Defendant

Alexander Christoforou

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Interlocutory Application for Strike Out

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claim should be struck out as an abuse of process under CPR 3.4(2)(b) on grounds of Henderson v Henderson abuse, collateral purpose/vexatious litigation, or Jameel abuse

Ratio Decidendi

The application for strike-out was refused because the claim was not a pure duplication of previous proceedings, the company had a legitimate protectible interest, there was no clear evidence of collateral purpose abuse, and the relief sought was not so trivial as to justify strike-out under Jameel abuse. The court found the claim could be managed proportionately and that the defendants had not been ambushed or unfairly prejudiced.

Court Disposition

Application for strike-out refused

Orders

  • Defendants to pay the claimant’s costs of the strike-out application, subject to detailed assessment.
  • Defendants to make a payment on account of costs in the sum of £50,000.