Farnell, R v
The conviction for murder was unsafe due to defective jury directions on provocation and failure to direct the jury to consider the reasonable man test in light of the appellant's mental condition. The verdict might reasonably have been different had the correct directions been given.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Regina; Appellant: Nicholas Farnell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- conviction for murder quashed; substituted with manslaughter by reason of provocation; sentence reduced
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Manslaughter, Provocation, Diminished Responsibility, Jury Directions, Appeal, Criminal Cases Review Commission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecutor
Nicholas Farnell
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge's direction on provocation complied with section 3 of the Homicide Act 1967
- 2 Whether the jury should have been directed to consider the reasonable man test in light of the appellant's mental condition
- 3 Whether the conviction for murder was safe given the defects in the summing-up
Ratio Decidendi
The conviction for murder was unsafe due to defective jury directions on provocation and failure to direct the jury to consider the reasonable man test in light of the appellant's mental condition. The verdict might reasonably have been different had the correct directions been given.
Court Disposition
conviction for murder quashed; substituted with manslaughter by reason of provocation; sentence reduced
Orders
- Conviction for murder quashed
- Verdict of manslaughter by reason of provocation substituted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment