Lomax Leisure Ltd v Miller & Anor

Lomax Leisure Ltd v Miller & Anor

Liquidators are not personally liable to pay declared dividends to individual creditors; cheques issued are not enforceable as cash instruments due to lack of consideration; remedy for non-payment is via court order, not damages or compensation; stopping payment was proper and caused no actionable loss.

Parties
Claimant: Lomax Leisure Limited (in liquidation); Defendant: Nicholas John Miller; Defendant: Timothy James Bramston
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 October 2007
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Liquidator Duties, Dividend Declaration, Cheque Liability, Members' Voluntary Liquidation, Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Lomax Leisure Limited (in liquidation)

Claimant

Nicholas John Miller

Defendant

Timothy James Bramston

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether liquidators are personally liable to pay declared dividends to creditors
  2. 2 Whether creditors have a personal claim for damages or compensation for non-payment of declared dividends
  3. 3 Whether cheques issued by liquidators are enforceable as cash instruments

Ratio Decidendi

Liquidators are not personally liable to pay declared dividends to individual creditors; cheques issued are not enforceable as cash instruments due to lack of consideration; remedy for non-payment is via court order, not damages or compensation; stopping payment was proper and caused no actionable loss.

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claimant to pay defendants' costs to be assessed on standard basis in default of agreement
  • Provisional order for costs stands unless further submissions are made by 19/10/07