Lomax Leisure Ltd v Miller & Anor
Liquidators are not personally liable to pay declared dividends to individual creditors; cheques issued are not enforceable as cash instruments due to lack of consideration; remedy for non-payment is via court order, not damages or compensation; stopping payment was proper and caused no actionable loss.
- Parties
- Claimant: Lomax Leisure Limited (in liquidation); Defendant: Nicholas John Miller; Defendant: Timothy James Bramston
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 October 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Liquidator Duties, Dividend Declaration, Cheque Liability, Members' Voluntary Liquidation, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lomax Leisure Limited (in liquidation)
Claimant
Nicholas John Miller
Defendant
Timothy James Bramston
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether liquidators are personally liable to pay declared dividends to creditors
- 2 Whether creditors have a personal claim for damages or compensation for non-payment of declared dividends
- 3 Whether cheques issued by liquidators are enforceable as cash instruments
Ratio Decidendi
Liquidators are not personally liable to pay declared dividends to individual creditors; cheques issued are not enforceable as cash instruments due to lack of consideration; remedy for non-payment is via court order, not damages or compensation; stopping payment was proper and caused no actionable loss.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Orders
- Claimant to pay defendants' costs to be assessed on standard basis in default of agreement
- Provisional order for costs stands unless further submissions are made by 19/10/07
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment