Thomas, R. v

Thomas, R. v

The judge acted fairly in deferring the admission of previous convictions and was entitled to admit them given the attack on the complainant's credibility. The prosecution's handling of prior false complaints was not abusive, and there were no exceptional circumstances to justify overturning the conviction for lurking doubt.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Nicholas Lee Thomas
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 January 2020
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Bad Character Evidence, Credibility, Abuse of Process, Rape, Kidnap, Assault, Jury Directions
Criminal Law Bad Character Evidence Credibility Abuse of Process Rape Kidnap Assault Jury Directions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Nicholas Lee Thomas

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting or deferring bad character evidence under Section 101(1)(g) CJA 2003
  2. 2 Whether the prosecution's handling of prior false complaints constituted abuse of process
  3. 3 Whether there was a 'lurking doubt' about the safety of the conviction

Ratio Decidendi

The judge acted fairly in deferring the admission of previous convictions and was entitled to admit them given the attack on the complainant's credibility. The prosecution's handling of prior false complaints was not abusive, and there were no exceptional circumstances to justify overturning the conviction for lurking doubt.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed