M Rohde Construction v Markham-David [2006] EWHC 814 (TCC) (20 March 2006)
The defendant demonstrated a real prospect of successfully defending the claim and moved promptly upon becoming aware of the proceedings; the prejudice to the defendant if the default judgment stood outweighed the prejudice to the claimant if it was set aside, justifying the exercise of discretion to set aside the default judgment.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 814 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: M. Rohde Construction; Defendant: Nicholas Markham-David
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Application to Set Aside Default Judgment / Interlocutory Hearing
- Outcome
- Default judgment set aside; action to proceed to trial.
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Default Judgment, Service of Documents, Natural Justice
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M. Rohde Construction
Claimant
Nicholas Markham-David
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application to Set Aside Default Judgment / Interlocutory Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant has a real prospect of successfully defending the claim
- 2 Whether the adjudicator's award is enforceable
- 3 Whether service of adjudication documents was effective
Ratio Decidendi
The defendant demonstrated a real prospect of successfully defending the claim and moved promptly upon becoming aware of the proceedings; the prejudice to the defendant if the default judgment stood outweighed the prejudice to the claimant if it was set aside, justifying the exercise of discretion to set aside the default judgment.
Court Disposition
Default judgment set aside; action to proceed to trial.
Orders
- Default judgment dated 18 March 2002 set aside.
- Action to proceed to trial.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment