Dilmun & Anor v Sutton & Anor

Dilmun & Anor v Sutton & Anor

Mr Sutton breached his fiduciary duties by dishonestly diverting a corporate opportunity to himself and FRP without disclosure or consent. FRP, through Ms Hamilton's knowledge and Sutton's role, participated in the breach and acted recklessly and unconscionably. Both are liable to account to the claimants for profits or benefits obtained from the Agreement.

Parties
Claimant: Crown Dilmun; Claimant: Dilmun Investments Limited; Defendant: Nicholas Sutton; Defendant: Fulham River Projects Limited
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 January 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment
Outcome
Both defendants found liable for breach of fiduciary duty and dishonest assistance; order for account of profits or constructive trust in favour of claimants.
Legal Topics
Breach of Fiduciary Duty, Dishonest Assistance, Knowing Receipt, Constructive Trust, Account of Profits, Damages, Director Duties, Conflict of Interest
Company Law Fiduciary Duties Trusts Contract Law Breach of Fiduciary Duty Dishonest Assistance Knowing Receipt Constructive Trust +4 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 9
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crown Dilmun

Claimant

Dilmun Investments Limited

Claimant

Nicholas Sutton

Defendant

Fulham River Projects Limited

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Did Mr Sutton breach his fiduciary duties as director by diverting a corporate opportunity to himself and FRP?
  2. 2 Is FRP liable for dishonest assistance and/or knowing receipt in respect of Mr Sutton's breach?
  3. 3 Are the claimants entitled to an account of profits, damages, or constructive trust over the Agreement?

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Sutton breached his fiduciary duties by dishonestly diverting a corporate opportunity to himself and FRP without disclosure or consent. FRP, through Ms Hamilton's knowledge and Sutton's role, participated in the breach and acted recklessly and unconscionably. Both are liable to account to the claimants for profits or benefits obtained from the Agreement.

Court Disposition

Both defendants found liable for breach of fiduciary duty and dishonest assistance; order for account of profits or constructive trust in favour of claimants.

Orders

  • Defendants to account to claimants for profits or benefits obtained from the Agreement.
  • Claimants not required to elect remedy at this stage; account to be taken at appropriate time.