Westguard, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 378 (11 April 2024)
The sentence of 18 months' imprisonment was not excessive or wrong in principle given the appellant's persistent breaches and aggravating factors; however, the stalking offence should have been made concurrent, not consecutive, as it arose from the same facts as the breaches of the restraining order.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 378
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Nicholas Westguard
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal Before Court of Appeal (criminal Division)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed (save for administrative restructuring of sentence)
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Restraining Order, Stalking, Sentencing, Restraining Orders, Aggravating Factors, Concurrent and Consecutive Sentences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Nicholas Westguard
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal Before Court of Appeal (criminal Division)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for breaches of a restraining order and stalking was excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether the stalking offence should have been sentenced consecutively or concurrently
- 3 Whether an unlimited restraining order was excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 18 months' imprisonment was not excessive or wrong in principle given the appellant's persistent breaches and aggravating factors; however, the stalking offence should have been made concurrent, not consecutive, as it arose from the same facts as the breaches of the restraining order.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed (save for administrative restructuring of sentence)
Orders
- The 18-month sentence is to be recorded solely for breaches of the restraining order.
- The 2-month sentence for stalking is to run concurrently, not consecutively.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment