Innes v Information Commissioner & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 1086 (31 July 2014)
Section 11(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 entitles an applicant to specify the software format (such as Excel) in which information is to be provided, provided the request is made contemporaneously with the substantive request for information; Mr Innes's request for Excel format was valid and should have...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] EWCA Civ 1086
- Parties
- Appellant: Nick Innes; First Respondent: Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Buckinghamshire County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Upper Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information Act 2000, Means of Communication of Information, Section 11 Requests, Section 16 Duty to Assist, Electronic Data Formats, Public Authority Obligations
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nick Innes
Appellant
Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Buckinghamshire County Council
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Upper Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 11(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 entitles an applicant to specify the software format (e.g., Excel) in which information is to be provided
- 2 Whether the applicant's request for information in Excel format was made 'on making his request for information' as required by section 11(1)
- 3 Whether Buckinghamshire County Council breached its duty under section 16 to provide advice and assistance regarding database headers
Ratio Decidendi
Section 11(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 entitles an applicant to specify the software format (such as Excel) in which information is to be provided, provided the request is made contemporaneously with the substantive request for information; Mr Innes's request for Excel format was valid and should have been complied with. The Council did not breach its section 16 duty as it provided annotated screenshots and offered further explanation, which satisfied the statutory requirement.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, dismissed in part
Orders
- Buckinghamshire County Council to provide the requested information to Mr Innes in Excel file format, unless representations are made within 21 days for a different order.
- Appeal dismissed regarding the section 16 complaint; no breach of duty to assist found.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment