R v Nico Phillips

R v Nico Phillips

The sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle; mental health was properly considered and mitigated; medical evidence ruled out Mental Health Act disposal; extension of time for appeal is refused.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Nico Phillips
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 October 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
renewed application refused
Legal Topics
Breach of Restraining Order, Sentencing, Mental Health and Criminal Liability, Extension of Time for Appeal
Criminal Law Breach of Restraining Order Sentencing Mental Health and Criminal Liability Extension of Time for Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Nico Phillips

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's mental health was adequately considered in sentencing
  3. 3 Whether a Mental Health Act disposal should have been imposed

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle; mental health was properly considered and mitigated; medical evidence ruled out Mental Health Act disposal; extension of time for appeal is refused.

Court Disposition

renewed application refused

Orders

  • extension of time for appeal refused
  • representation order refused