Stocker v Stocker [2016] EWHC 147 (QB) (29 January 2016)

Stocker v Stocker [2016] EWHC 147 (QB) (29 January 2016)

It is not plain from the pleadings that the defence of absolute privilege is bound to succeed; whether the email was made for the purpose of judicial proceedings is a matter for trial. The claim based on the email publication cannot be struck out as disclosing no real and substantial tort at this stage.

Citation
[2016] EWHC 147 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Ronald Terance Stocker; Defendant: Nicola Stocker
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 January 2016
Procedural Posture
Libel Claim (defamation) / Pre Trial Review; Application to Strike Out Part of Claim
Outcome
Defendant's application to strike out the claim based on the email publication is refused.
Legal Topics
Absolute Privilege, Qualified Privilege, Strike Out Applications, Libel, Abuse of Process, Real and Substantial Tort
Defamation Civil Procedure Absolute Privilege Qualified Privilege Strike Out Applications Libel Abuse of Process Real and Substantial Tort

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 15 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ronald Terance Stocker

Claimant

Nicola Stocker

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Libel Claim (defamation) / Pre Trial Review; Application to Strike Out Part of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's email publication is protected by absolute privilege
  2. 2 Whether the claim based on the email publication should be struck out for not disclosing a real and substantial tort

Ratio Decidendi

It is not plain from the pleadings that the defence of absolute privilege is bound to succeed; whether the email was made for the purpose of judicial proceedings is a matter for trial. The claim based on the email publication cannot be struck out as disclosing no real and substantial tort at this stage.

Court Disposition

Defendant's application to strike out the claim based on the email publication is refused.

Orders

  • Claim based on the email publication will proceed to trial.