Nigel Briant v Hugo Baldacchino & Anor
The covenant secures practical benefits to the objectors but not of substantial value or advantage. The proposed development is reasonable, planning permissions have been granted, and compensation of £56,250 is adequate for any loss. The application for modification is allowed subject to conditions and payment of compensation.
- Parties
- Applicant: Nigel Briant; Objector: Hugo Baldacchino; Objector: Cheryl Baldacchino
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Section 84 Law of Property Act 1925 / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application allowed subject to conditions and compensation
- Legal Topics
- Restrictive Covenants, Modification of Covenants, Compensation for Modification, Planning Permission
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nigel Briant
Applicant
Hugo Baldacchino
Objector
Cheryl Baldacchino
Objector
Procedural Posture
Application Under Section 84 Law of Property Act 1925 / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the restrictive covenant should be modified to permit redevelopment of the site for two houses and outbuildings
- 2 Whether the restriction secures practical benefits of substantial value or advantage to the objectors
- 3 Whether compensation is adequate for any loss or disadvantage
Ratio Decidendi
The covenant secures practical benefits to the objectors but not of substantial value or advantage. The proposed development is reasonable, planning permissions have been granted, and compensation of £56,250 is adequate for any loss. The application for modification is allowed subject to conditions and payment of compensation.
Court Disposition
Application allowed subject to conditions and compensation
Orders
- The restrictive covenant in the Charges Register for Smugglers Hyde (Title DT151352) is modified under section 84(1)(aa) Law of Property Act 1925 to permit the developments granted planning permission by Dorset Council on 12 January 2024 (P/FUL/2023/04037) and 23 July 2025 (P/FUL/2025/00387), subject to conditions...
- Additional buildings in the rear gardens are permitted provided they fall within permitted development and the boundary is consistent with approved drawings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment