Harding v Scott-Moncrieff [2004] EWHC 1733 (QB) (23 July 2004)

Harding v Scott-Moncrieff [2004] EWHC 1733 (QB) (23 July 2004)

The defendant breached the duty of care by failing to remain with the patient, failing to call an emergency ambulance, and failing to administer standard treatments. On the balance of probabilities, these breaches caused the death, as prompt hospitalisation and treatment would have resulted in survival. Damages are...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2004] EWHC 1733 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Anne Harding (Widow and Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Harding deceased); Defendant: Nigel Scott-Moncrieff
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 July 2004
Procedural Posture
Clinical Negligence Claim / High Court Trial, Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed
Legal Topics
Breach of Duty, Causation, Standard of Care, Damages, Funeral Expenses, Dependency Claim
Tort Law Medical Negligence Breach of Duty Causation Standard of Care Damages Funeral Expenses Dependency Claim

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anne Harding (Widow and Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Harding deceased)

Claimant

Nigel Scott-Moncrieff

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Clinical Negligence Claim / High Court Trial, Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the defendant general practitioner breached the duty of care owed to the deceased
  2. 2 Whether breaches of duty caused the death of the deceased
  3. 3 Appropriate measure of damages including dependency and funeral expenses

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant breached the duty of care by failing to remain with the patient, failing to call an emergency ambulance, and failing to administer standard treatments. On the balance of probabilities, these breaches caused the death, as prompt hospitalisation and treatment would have resulted in survival. Damages are awarded for bereavement, funeral expenses (excluding memorial service), dependency, and pain and suffering.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed

Orders

  • Damages awarded for bereavement (£7,500), funeral expenses (£7,000), dependency (to be agreed based on findings), and pain and suffering (£1,500)
  • Claim for memorial service expenses and certain professional fees disallowed