Smith v ADVFN Plc & Ors
The judge found that the claims against individual defendants had no realistic prospect of success and it was appropriate to keep the stays in place, but granted permission to appeal in certain cases where arguable merit remained and in relation to the order staying all future claims.
- Parties
- Appellant: Nigel Smith; Respondent: ADVFN Plc and Others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal From High Court Order
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal granted in part, refused in part
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Civil Restraint Orders, Stay of Proceedings, Costs, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nigel Smith
Appellant
ADVFN Plc and Others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Permission to Appeal From High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the stays imposed on the appellant's claims should be set aside or varied
- 2 Whether the claims against individual defendants had any realistic prospect of success
- 3 Whether the order staying all future claims was appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The judge found that the claims against individual defendants had no realistic prospect of success and it was appropriate to keep the stays in place, but granted permission to appeal in certain cases where arguable merit remained and in relation to the order staying all future claims.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal granted in part, refused in part
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted in the cases of Macdonald HQ07X02620, Byrne HQ07X03106, Tuppen HQ08X00135, Collins HQ08X01190, O’Brien HQ08X01192, McIntyre HQ08X01193, George Smith HQ08X01262 and Gourlay HQ08X01584.
- Permission to appeal granted regarding the order staying all future claims.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment