Interlink Express Parcels Ltd v Night Trunkers Ltd & Anor [2001] EWCA Civ 360 (14 March 2001)
The drivers supplied by Night Trunkers to Interlink were not 'servants' or 'agents' of Interlink within the meaning of section 58(2) of the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995. The drivers remained employees of Night Trunkers, and there was no legal transfer of employment or agency relationship with Interlink. Therefore, the agreement was void and unenforceable as its performance would necessarily involve contravention of section 2 of the 1995 Act.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 360
- Parties
- Respondent: Interlink Express Parcels Ltd; Appellant: Night Trunkers Ltd & Anr
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) on Preliminary Issue / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Operator's Licence Requirements, Vicarious Liability, Employment Status, Illegality of Contract, Agency Relationships
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Interlink Express Parcels Ltd
Respondent
Night Trunkers Ltd & Anr
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Appeal From High Court (chancery Division) on Preliminary Issue / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether drivers supplied by Night Trunkers to Interlink were 'servants' or 'agents' of Interlink for the purposes of section 58(2) of the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995
- 2 Whether the agreement between Night Trunkers and Interlink was void for illegality under section 2 of the 1995 Act
Ratio Decidendi
The drivers supplied by Night Trunkers to Interlink were not 'servants' or 'agents' of Interlink within the meaning of section 58(2) of the Goods Vehicles (Licensing of Operators) Act 1995. The drivers remained employees of Night Trunkers, and there was no legal transfer of employment or agency relationship with Interlink. Therefore, the agreement was void and unenforceable as its performance would necessarily involve contravention of section 2 of the 1995 Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Declaration that the agreement dated 1 May 1998 is void, unenforceable and of no effect
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment