McKenzie, R v

McKenzie, R v

The sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment was not excessive given the seriousness and prevalence of the offence, and the need for deterrence. However, the costs order was reduced to £1,500 as the original sum was excessive for the appellant's means.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Nikki David Robert McKenzie
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 August 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence and Costs Order
Outcome
Appeal against sentence dismissed; appeal against costs order allowed in part.
Legal Topics
Fraud, Insurance Fraud, Sentencing, Costs Orders
Criminal Law Fraud Insurance Fraud Sentencing Costs Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Nikki David Robert McKenzie

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence and Costs Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment for insurance fraud was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the order for costs against the appellant was appropriate given his means

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment was not excessive given the seriousness and prevalence of the offence, and the need for deterrence. However, the costs order was reduced to £1,500 as the original sum was excessive for the appellant's means.

Court Disposition

Appeal against sentence dismissed; appeal against costs order allowed in part.

Orders

  • Sentence of 15 months’ imprisonment upheld.
  • Order for costs reduced from £3,242 to £1,500.