Sutcliffe v Lloyd & Anor

Sutcliffe v Lloyd & Anor

Mr Sutcliffe is entitled to £25,000 as the minimum equity to do justice for his contributions to the Willes Road development, payable by MGL and personally guaranteed by Mr Lloyd. The petition for winding up Nimega is dismissed as the deadlock provisions were not exhausted before proceedings, and the Part 20 claims for restitution and unjust enrichment are dismissed as no enforceable obligation or unconscionability is established.

Parties
Claimant/petitioner/part 20 Defendant: Andrew Michael Sutcliffe; Defendant/respondent/part 20 Claimant: William David Lloyd; Defendant/respondent: MGL (Rugby) Limited; Respondent: Nimega Limited; Part 20 Claimant: Amanda Wakelin Lloyd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
09 June 2008
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment
Outcome
Petition and Part 20 claims dismissed; equity awarded to Mr Sutcliffe.
Legal Topics
Shareholder Disputes, Winding Up, Unfair Prejudice, Restitution, Joint Venture, Deadlock Provisions, Unjust Enrichment
Company Law Equity Contract Law Shareholder Disputes Winding Up Unfair Prejudice Restitution Joint Venture +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 10
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Michael Sutcliffe

Claimant/petitioner/part 20 Defendant

William David Lloyd

Defendant/respondent/part 20 Claimant

MGL (Rugby) Limited

Defendant/respondent

Nimega Limited

Respondent

Amanda Wakelin Lloyd

Part 20 Claimant

Procedural Posture

Civil / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 How should the equity in favour of Mr Sutcliffe be satisfied and by whom?
  2. 2 Was Mr Sutcliffe under a contractual obligation to build the Dunchurch Road development?
  3. 3 Was the conduct of Nimega unfairly prejudicial to Mr Sutcliffe's interests?

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Sutcliffe is entitled to £25,000 as the minimum equity to do justice for his contributions to the Willes Road development, payable by MGL and personally guaranteed by Mr Lloyd. The petition for winding up Nimega is dismissed as the deadlock provisions were not exhausted before proceedings, and the Part 20 claims for restitution and unjust enrichment are dismissed as no enforceable obligation or unconscionability is established.

Court Disposition

Petition and Part 20 claims dismissed; equity awarded to Mr Sutcliffe.

Orders

  • MGL to pay £25,000 to Mr Sutcliffe by 31 August 2008, personally guaranteed by Mr Lloyd.
  • Petition for winding up Nimega dismissed.