Nisaa Mohedin Hawa v Information Commissioner

Nisaa Mohedin Hawa v Information Commissioner

The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with the Tribunal’s direction to provide written submissions, as warned under Rule 8(3)(a).

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Appellant: Nisaa Mohedin Hawa; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Struck Out
Outcome
struck out
Legal Topics
GDPR, Erasure of Personal Data, Jurisdiction, Standing
Data Protection Information Rights GDPR Erasure of Personal Data Jurisdiction Standing

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nisaa Mohedin Hawa

Appellant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Struck Out

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to hear the appeal?
  2. 2 Does the appellant have standing to bring the appeal?
  3. 3 Should the appeal be struck out for failure to comply with directions?

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was struck out because the appellant failed to comply with the Tribunal’s direction to provide written submissions, as warned under Rule 8(3)(a).

Court Disposition

struck out

Orders

  • The application is struck out pursuant to Rule 8(3)(a) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.