NM v SM (Rights of custody in foreign court; acquiescence by that court)
The Irish court, possessing rights of custody, had a clear opportunity to assert those rights and retain the child in Ireland but chose not to do so, amounting to acquiescence in the child's retention in England. Therefore, the application for summary return under the Hague Convention is dismissed.
- Parties
- Applicant: NM; Respondent: SM
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Summary Return of a Child Under the Hague Convention / Final Hearing
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Hague Convention, Rights of Custody, Acquiescence, Guardianship, Child Welfare
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NM
Applicant
SM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Summary Return of a Child Under the Hague Convention / Final Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the retention of the child in England is wrongful under the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether rights of custody exist in the Irish court
- 3 Whether the Irish court has acquiesced in the retention of the child
Ratio Decidendi
The Irish court, possessing rights of custody, had a clear opportunity to assert those rights and retain the child in Ireland but chose not to do so, amounting to acquiescence in the child's retention in England. Therefore, the application for summary return under the Hague Convention is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The application for summary return of the child to Ireland under the Hague Convention is dismissed.
- The undertakings given by the mother regarding cooperation with Irish proceedings and return of the child as ordered by the Irish court are to remain in effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment