Rosenzweig v NMC Recordings Ltd
Mr Rosenzweig qualifies as a 'person interested in the charity' for the purposes of applying for permission, but authority should not be given to prosecute the proceedings as the claim lacks legal merit, is not properly pleaded, would exhaust the Charity's assets, and does not serve the public benefit.
- Parties
- Claimant: Michael Rosenzweig; Defendant: NMC Recordings Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Charity Proceedings / Application for Permission to Bring Charity Proceedings Under Section 115(5) of the Charities Act 2011
- Outcome
- Permission to prosecute charity proceedings refused; costs awarded against applicant.
- Legal Topics
- Standing of Interested Persons, Trustee Duties, Permission to Bring Charity Proceedings, Costs in Charity Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Rosenzweig
Claimant
NMC Recordings Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Charity Proceedings / Application for Permission to Bring Charity Proceedings Under Section 115(5) of the Charities Act 2011
Legal Issues
- 1 Is Mr Rosenzweig a 'person interested in the charity' under section 115 of the Charities Act 2011?
- 2 Should permission be granted to prosecute charity proceedings against NMC Recordings Ltd?
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Rosenzweig qualifies as a 'person interested in the charity' for the purposes of applying for permission, but authority should not be given to prosecute the proceedings as the claim lacks legal merit, is not properly pleaded, would exhaust the Charity's assets, and does not serve the public benefit.
Court Disposition
Permission to prosecute charity proceedings refused; costs awarded against applicant.
Orders
- Mr Rosenzweig must pay the Access to Justice Fund the sum of £15,000 by 17 January 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment