Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. & Anor v Nokia Corporation & Anor

Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc. & Anor v Nokia Corporation & Anor

The court granted permission to serve the proceedings out of the jurisdiction and granted the anti-anti-suit injunction (AASI) and associated relief on an ex parte basis. The judge found that, although the risk of Nokia seeking anti-suit or anti-interim licence injunctions in foreign courts was not overwhelming, it...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.; Claimant: DPLAY Entertainment Limited; Defendant: Nokia Corporation; Defendant: Nokia Technologies Oy
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Patent/intellectual Property / Ex Parte Application for Service Out of Jurisdiction and Anti Anti Suit Injunction (aasi) Relief
Outcome
Permission to serve out of the jurisdiction granted; anti-anti-suit injunction (AASI) and associated relief granted on an ex parte interim basis.
Legal Topics
Standard Essential Patents (seps), Rand/frand Licensing, Anti Suit Injunctions, Anti Anti Suit Injunctions, Jurisdiction, Service Out of Jurisdiction, Mandatory and Prohibitory Injunctions, Quia Timet Relief
Intellectual Property Patents Conflict of Laws Civil Procedure Standard Essential Patents (seps) Rand/frand Licensing Anti Suit Injunctions Anti Anti Suit Injunctions +4 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 29 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.

Claimant

DPLAY Entertainment Limited

Claimant

Nokia Corporation

Defendant

Nokia Technologies Oy

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Patent/intellectual Property / Ex Parte Application for Service Out of Jurisdiction and Anti Anti Suit Injunction (aasi) Relief

  1. 1 Whether the English court should grant permission to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction on the Defendants for patent and RAND claims
  2. 2 Whether the English court should grant an anti-anti-suit injunction (AASI) and associated relief to protect its jurisdiction and the integrity of its process in the context of global SEP litigation
  3. 3 Whether the risk of the Defendants seeking anti-suit relief in foreign jurisdictions justifies ex parte interim AASI relief

Ratio Decidendi

The court granted permission to serve the proceedings out of the jurisdiction and granted the anti-anti-suit injunction (AASI) and associated relief on an ex parte basis. The judge found that, although the risk of Nokia seeking anti-suit or anti-interim licence injunctions in foreign courts was not overwhelming, it was not negligible and justified interim relief to protect the English court's jurisdiction and the integrity of its process. The relief was justified by the need to preserve the status quo and prevent potentially irreparable harm to the Claimants' claims, pending a return date at which the Defendants could be heard. The court considered the relevant legal principles, the...

Court Disposition

Permission to serve out of the jurisdiction granted; anti-anti-suit injunction (AASI) and associated relief granted on an ex parte interim basis.

Orders

  • Permission to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction on both Defendants granted.
  • Confidentiality order granted.