L (Children), Re [2001] EWCA Civ 151 (5 February 2001)
Father's repeated, admitted breaches of clear court orders justified committal; no legal or factual basis for appeals out of time; occupation and non-molestation orders lawfully made and properly enforced.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Civ 151
- Parties
- Appellant Father: Mr L; Respondent Mother: Mrs L
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed; permission to appeal out of time refused; costs awarded but not to be enforced except by ancillary relief judge; permission to appeal to House of Lords refused.
- Legal Topics
- Non Molestation Orders, Occupation Orders, Contact With Children, Committal for Contempt, Appeal Out of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr L
Appellant Father
Mrs L
Respondent Mother
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From High Court (family Division) to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether committal orders for contempt were appropriate
- 2 Whether permission to appeal out of time should be granted
- 3 Lawfulness and effect of occupation and non-molestation orders
Ratio Decidendi
Father's repeated, admitted breaches of clear court orders justified committal; no legal or factual basis for appeals out of time; occupation and non-molestation orders lawfully made and properly enforced.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed; permission to appeal out of time refused; costs awarded but not to be enforced except by ancillary relief judge; permission to appeal to House of Lords refused.
Orders
- Appeals of 31st January and 31st October dismissed
- Applications for permission to appeal out of time refused with costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment