HM Revenue & Customs v Begum & Ors
Permission to amend particulars of claim in both actions is granted because, except as limited, the proposed amendments either do not introduce new claims or causes of action, or if they do, those claims arise out of the same or substantially the same facts as previously pleaded claims. The court is satisfied that the amended claims have a real prospect of success and that any prejudice to defendants can be addressed at trial.
- Parties
- Claimant: Her Majesty's Commissioners for Revenue and Customs; Defendant: Noorasa Begum; Defendant: Cellcom Limited; Defendant: STM Fidecs Trust Company Limited; Defendant: Sandeep Golechha; Defendant: Eastern Fusion Limited; Defendant: Hassan Khan; Defendant: Ward Enterprises Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Ruling on Applications to Amend Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Permission to amend particulars of claim granted, subject to limitations indicated in judgment.
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy, VAT Fraud, Amendment of Pleadings, Limitation Periods, Section 423 Insolvency Act, Freezing Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Her Majesty's Commissioners for Revenue and Customs
Claimant
Noorasa Begum
Defendant
Cellcom Limited
Defendant
STM Fidecs Trust Company Limited
Defendant
Sandeep Golechha
Defendant
Eastern Fusion Limited
Defendant
Hassan Khan
Defendant
Ward Enterprises Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ruling on Applications to Amend Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC should be granted permission to amend particulars of claim in two actions after expiry of limitation periods
- 2 Whether the proposed amendments introduce new claims or causes of action
- 3 Whether new claims arise out of the same or substantially the same facts as previously pleaded claims
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to amend particulars of claim in both actions is granted because, except as limited, the proposed amendments either do not introduce new claims or causes of action, or if they do, those claims arise out of the same or substantially the same facts as previously pleaded claims. The court is satisfied that the amended claims have a real prospect of success and that any prejudice to defendants can be addressed at trial.
Court Disposition
Permission to amend particulars of claim granted, subject to limitations indicated in judgment.
Orders
- HMRC granted leave to amend particulars of claim in both actions.
- Scope of claim in 2002 action limited as indicated in judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment