Schmidt v Wong [2005] EWCA Civ 1506 (07 December 2005)

Schmidt v Wong [2005] EWCA Civ 1506 (07 December 2005)

The County Court lacked jurisdiction to grant a freezing order under the Remedies Regulations. The judge was not obliged to transfer the application to the High Court or to sit as a High Court judge. The proper procedure was to apply for a freezing order in the High Court under the Jurisdiction Order. The appeal was...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2005] EWCA Civ 1506
Parties
Appellant: Nora Ilse Augusta Schmidt; Respondent: Simon Wong
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 December 2005
Procedural Posture
Appeal From County Court (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Freezing Injunctions, Jurisdiction of County Court, Transfer to High Court, Case Management Powers, Remedies Regulations
Civil Procedure Landlord and Tenant Personal Injury Freezing Injunctions Jurisdiction of County Court Transfer to High Court Case Management Powers Remedies Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nora Ilse Augusta Schmidt

Appellant

Simon Wong

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal From County Court (civil) / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether a County Court has jurisdiction to grant a freezing order
  2. 2 Whether a judge sitting in the County Court can exercise High Court powers under section 9 authorisation
  3. 3 Whether the County Court should have transferred the application to the High Court

Ratio Decidendi

The County Court lacked jurisdiction to grant a freezing order under the Remedies Regulations. The judge was not obliged to transfer the application to the High Court or to sit as a High Court judge. The proper procedure was to apply for a freezing order in the High Court under the Jurisdiction Order. The appeal was dismissed as the judge made no error of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed