North Shore Ventures Ltd v Anstead Holdings Inc
In the particular circumstances, the judge was entitled to find that the appellants had practical control over the trust documents due to their orchestrated relationship with the trustees, justifying the production order under CPR 71.2 and CPR 31.8.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: North Shore Ventures Limited; Respondent: Anstead Holdings Inc; Appellant: Mr Fomichev; Appellant: Mr Peganov
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 January 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Control of Documents, Trust Beneficiary Rights, Freezing Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
North Shore Ventures Limited
Applicant
Anstead Holdings Inc
Respondent
Mr Fomichev
Appellant
Mr Peganov
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants had 'control' over trust documents for purposes of CPR 71.2 and CPR 31.8
- 2 Whether the judge had jurisdiction to order production of trust documents not in appellants' physical possession
- 3 Whether the relationship between appellants and trustees justified treating documents as within appellants' control
Ratio Decidendi
In the particular circumstances, the judge was entitled to find that the appellants had practical control over the trust documents due to their orchestrated relationship with the trustees, justifying the production order under CPR 71.2 and CPR 31.8.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Production order for trust documents upheld against appellants
- Appellants may revisit compliance with further evidence if necessary
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment