BC, R (on the application of) v North Yorkshire County Council & Anor

BC, R (on the application of) v North Yorkshire County Council & Anor

The defendant acted lawfully and reasonably in using the 'school year' (September to August) for admissions, as required by primary legislation. The claimant had no legitimate expectation that 'academic year' would be used, and there was no unlawfulness or irrationality in the defendant's arrangements.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: BC; Defendant: North Yorkshire County Council; Interested Party: Department of Education
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 August 2014
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Rolled Up Hearing (permission and Substantive Determination)
Outcome
Application refused
Legal Topics
School Admissions, Chronological Age Group, Interpretation of Statutory Terms, Legitimate Expectation
Administrative Law Education Law School Admissions Chronological Age Group Interpretation of Statutory Terms Legitimate Expectation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BC

Claimant

North Yorkshire County Council

Defendant

Department of Education

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Rolled Up Hearing (permission and Substantive Determination)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's use of 'school year' rather than 'academic year' for admissions is lawful
  2. 2 Whether the claimant had a legitimate expectation that 'academic year' would be used
  3. 3 Whether the defendant's decision was unreasonable or irrational

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant acted lawfully and reasonably in using the 'school year' (September to August) for admissions, as required by primary legislation. The claimant had no legitimate expectation that 'academic year' would be used, and there was no unlawfulness or irrationality in the defendant's arrangements.

Court Disposition

Application refused

Orders

  • Permission to apply for judicial review granted
  • Substantive claim refused