Northampton Rapid Transit System, R (on the application of) v Norampton Borough Council [2000] EWHC Admin 367 (10 July 2000)
RTI's case on the legitimate expectation issue, based on the effect and interpretation of the SPG and related actions by NBC and NCC, is sufficiently arguable to merit the grant of permission for judicial review. The other issues, including the Environmental Assessment Issue, are sufficiently complex to be left for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] EWHC Admin 367
- Parties
- Claimant: Northampton Rapid System Ltd.; Defendant: Northampton Borough Council; Interested Party / Second Defendant: English Partnership (formerly the Commission for New Towns)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Permission Application
- Outcome
- Permission granted to apply for judicial review; permission granted to amend Form 86A; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- Legitimate Expectation, Judicial Review, Planning Permission, Environmental Assessment, Public Transport Policy
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Northampton Rapid System Ltd.
Claimant
Northampton Borough Council
Defendant
English Partnership (formerly the Commission for New Towns)
Interested Party / Second Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Permission Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether policy pronouncements and actions by NBC and NCC created legitimate expectations for RTI regarding planning decisions and support for a rapid transit system.
- 2 Whether the decision not to require an Environmental Impact Assessment was lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
RTI's case on the legitimate expectation issue, based on the effect and interpretation of the SPG and related actions by NBC and NCC, is sufficiently arguable to merit the grant of permission for judicial review. The other issues, including the Environmental Assessment Issue, are sufficiently complex to be left for the substantive hearing.
Court Disposition
Permission granted to apply for judicial review; permission granted to amend Form 86A; costs reserved.
Orders
- Permission granted to amend Form 86A.
- Interested Party (English Partnership) to be formally joined as Second Defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment