Cooperative Group Ltd, R (on the application of) v Northumberland County Council

Cooperative Group Ltd, R (on the application of) v Northumberland County Council

The Defendant did not have sufficient information to rationally adopt a negative screening opinion; the decision was based on assurances of future assessment rather than actual environmental impact data, violating established legal principles. There was no impermissible delay as proceedings were brought within the statutory period and no prejudice was shown.

Parties
Claimant: Cooperative Group Limited; Defendant: Northumberland County Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 March 2010
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim allowed; planning permission quashed.
Legal Topics
Environmental Impact Assessment, Planning Permission, Judicial Review, Delay in Proceedings
Administrative Law Environmental Law Planning Law Environmental Impact Assessment Planning Permission Judicial Review Delay in Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cooperative Group Limited

Claimant

Northumberland County Council

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant had sufficient information to adopt a negative screening opinion under the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 1999
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant acted irrationally in issuing its negative screening opinion
  3. 3 Whether the claim should be dismissed for impermissible delay

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant did not have sufficient information to rationally adopt a negative screening opinion; the decision was based on assurances of future assessment rather than actual environmental impact data, violating established legal principles. There was no impermissible delay as proceedings were brought within the statutory period and no prejudice was shown.

Court Disposition

Claim allowed; planning permission quashed.

Orders

  • Planning permission granted by the Defendant in relation to the scheme is quashed.
  • Defendant to pay Claimant £40,000 inclusive of VAT in full and final settlement of costs.