Lewis v Norwich Union Healthcare Ltd [2009] EW Misc 2 (EWCC) (26 January 2009)

Lewis v Norwich Union Healthcare Ltd [2009] EW Misc 2 (EWCC) (26 January 2009)

Norwich Union failed to discharge the burden of proving that it was induced by the non-disclosure of the GP visit to enter into the policy or to do so on the terms offered. The evidence did not establish that disclosure would have led to different terms or refusal of cover. The waiver argument failed, and the ABI Statement was not incorporated into the policy.

Citation
[2009] EW Misc 2 (EWCC)
Parties
Claimant: Mr Lewis; Defendant: Norwich Union
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 January 2009
Procedural Posture
Insurance Contract Dispute / Judgment on Preliminary Issues After Trial
Outcome
Judgment for Mr Lewis on the issue of inducement; Norwich Union not entitled to avoid the policy for non-disclosure of the GP visit.
Legal Topics
Non Disclosure, Materiality, Inducement, Policy Avoidance, Waiver, Construction of Insurance Contracts
Insurance Law Contract Law Non Disclosure Materiality Inducement Policy Avoidance Waiver Construction of Insurance Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Lewis

Claimant

Norwich Union

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Insurance Contract Dispute / Judgment on Preliminary Issues After Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the non-disclosure of a GP visit by Mr Lewis was material to the insurer's decision to accept the risk or on what terms
  2. 2 Whether Norwich Union knew or waived the requirement to disclose the GP visit
  3. 3 Whether Norwich Union was induced by the non-disclosure to enter the policy or on those terms

Ratio Decidendi

Norwich Union failed to discharge the burden of proving that it was induced by the non-disclosure of the GP visit to enter into the policy or to do so on the terms offered. The evidence did not establish that disclosure would have led to different terms or refusal of cover. The waiver argument failed, and the ABI Statement was not incorporated into the policy.

Court Disposition

Judgment for Mr Lewis on the issue of inducement; Norwich Union not entitled to avoid the policy for non-disclosure of the GP visit.

Orders

  • Norwich Union's avoidance of the policy is set aside.
  • No order on the issue of negligence under Question 4 as it is not relevant.