Great Hill Equity Partners II LP v Novator One LP & Ors [2007] EWHC 1210 (Comm) (22 May 2007)
Clause 6.5(b) of the option deed is an anti-dilution provision that protects GHP's putative 23% stake in Florissant's Preferred Shares only if GHP exercises the option. The rights conferred by clause 6.5(b) are conditional on the option being exercised and do not give GHP an immediate right to participate in new shareholder loans or share issues if the option is not exercised. Pre-contractual negotiations and draft Heads of Terms are inadmissible as aids to construction in this context.
- Citation
- [2007] EWHC 1210 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Great Hill Equity Partners II LP; Defendant: Novator One LP; Defendant: KRC Communications Holdings NV; Defendant: Beleggingsmaatschappij Florissant NV; Defendant: Kenn Robson; Defendant: Andrin Bachman
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Action / Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Interpretation of Contracts, Shareholder Rights, Pre Emption Rights, Anti Dilution Provisions, Admissibility of Pre Contractual Negotiations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Great Hill Equity Partners II LP
Claimant
Novator One LP
Defendant
KRC Communications Holdings NV
Defendant
Beleggingsmaatschappij Florissant NV
Defendant
Kenn Robson
Defendant
Andrin Bachman
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Action / Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether clause 6.5(b) of the option deed entitled GHP to participate in new shareholder loans or new issues of shares regardless of exercise of the option
- 2 Whether pre-contractual negotiations and draft Heads of Terms are admissible in construing the contract
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 6.5(b) of the option deed is an anti-dilution provision that protects GHP's putative 23% stake in Florissant's Preferred Shares only if GHP exercises the option. The rights conferred by clause 6.5(b) are conditional on the option being exercised and do not give GHP an immediate right to participate in new shareholder loans or share issues if the option is not exercised. Pre-contractual negotiations and draft Heads of Terms are inadmissible as aids to construction in this context.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Orders
- GHP's claim for participation in the Keaton loan or July 2005 share issue is dismissed.
- GHP is not entitled to damages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment