N (Children) (Interim Care), Re
The removal of the children from their grandparents was disproportionate and not justified by the evidence; the emotional harm from removal outweighed speculative risks of harm from remaining. A psychological assessment was necessary to resolve issues regarding the children's welfare.
- Parties
- Appellant: NP; Appellant: JP; Appellant: GP; Respondent: A Local Authority; Respondent: NN; Respondent: TN; Respondent: JN; Respondent: AN
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings / Appeal Against Interim Care Orders and Refusal of Psychological Assessment
- Outcome
- appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- Interim Care Orders, Child Arrangements, Psychological Assessment, Removal of Children, Welfare Checklist, Proportionality, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NP
Appellant
JP
Appellant
GP
Appellant
A Local Authority
Respondent
NN
Respondent
TN
Respondent
JN
Respondent
AN
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings / Appeal Against Interim Care Orders and Refusal of Psychological Assessment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether removal of children from grandparents under interim care order was necessary and proportionate
- 2 Whether refusal to permit psychological assessment was correct
Ratio Decidendi
The removal of the children from their grandparents was disproportionate and not justified by the evidence; the emotional harm from removal outweighed speculative risks of harm from remaining. A psychological assessment was necessary to resolve issues regarding the children's welfare.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed
Orders
- interim care orders discharged
- child arrangements orders made for children to reside with grandparents
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment