R v NRZ

R v NRZ

The application for extension of time was refused because there was no good reason for the lengthy delay and the grounds of appeal, including the application to adduce fresh evidence, were devoid of merit. The non-disclosure of L's position was not material, criticisms of trial counsel were unjustified, and the requests for further disclosure were speculative.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: NRZ
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Conviction
Outcome
renewed application for extension of time to appeal conviction dismissed
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Appeals, Fresh Evidence, Disclosure, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

NRZ

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time to Appeal Conviction

  1. 1 Whether the application for extension of time to appeal conviction should be granted
  2. 2 Whether non-disclosure of a statement from L was material to the outcome
  3. 3 Whether trial counsel were ineffective for not calling certain witnesses

Ratio Decidendi

The application for extension of time was refused because there was no good reason for the lengthy delay and the grounds of appeal, including the application to adduce fresh evidence, were devoid of merit. The non-disclosure of L's position was not material, criticisms of trial counsel were unjustified, and the requests for further disclosure were speculative.

Court Disposition

renewed application for extension of time to appeal conviction dismissed

Orders

  • Application dismissed