Ballesteros v Nursing & Midwifery Council

Ballesteros v Nursing & Midwifery Council

The Panel's findings that the appellant's fitness to practise was impaired by reason of repeated and serious dishonesty, lack of full insight, and risk of future misconduct were justified on the evidence. The sanction of striking off was proportionate given the gravity and recurrence of the misconduct, and the public interest in maintaining trust in the profession. Article 8 ECHR was not engaged or, if engaged, was justified under Article 8(2).

Parties
Claimant: Julie Ballesteros; Defendant: Nursing & Midwifery Council
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Fitness to Practise, Dishonesty, Sanctions, Human Rights (article 8)
Administrative Law Professional Regulation Fitness to Practise Dishonesty Sanctions Human Rights (article 8)

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Julie Ballesteros

Claimant

Nursing & Midwifery Council

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant's fitness to practise as a nurse was impaired by reason of misconduct
  2. 2 Whether the sanction of striking off was justified and proportionate
  3. 3 Whether Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights was engaged

Ratio Decidendi

The Panel's findings that the appellant's fitness to practise was impaired by reason of repeated and serious dishonesty, lack of full insight, and risk of future misconduct were justified on the evidence. The sanction of striking off was proportionate given the gravity and recurrence of the misconduct, and the public interest in maintaining trust in the profession. Article 8 ECHR was not engaged or, if engaged, was justified under Article 8(2).

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed
  • Costs order made in the usual terms due to legal aid