Nursing & Midwifery Council, R (on the application of) v McDermid [2016] EWHC 701 (Admin) (08 March 2016)
The interim order is extended because the proceedings would have concluded within the original period but for the respondent's adjournment request, and the evidence supports extension.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 701 (Admin)
- Parties
- Applicant: Nursing & Midwifery Council; Respondent: McDermid
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Interim Order Extension
- Outcome
- interim order extended
- Legal Topics
- Interim Orders, Adjournment, Regulatory Proceedings
Administrative Law Professional Regulation Interim Orders Adjournment Regulatory Proceedings
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Nursing & Midwifery Council
Applicant
McDermid
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Interim Order Extension
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the interim order should be extended
- 2 Whether the adjournment request justifies extension
Ratio Decidendi
The interim order is extended because the proceedings would have concluded within the original period but for the respondent's adjournment request, and the evidence supports extension.
Court Disposition
interim order extended
Orders
- Interim order extended to 4 pm on 9 July 2016
- Permission to apply to vary or discharge
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment