Nurtur.Group Limited, Re

Nurtur.Group Limited, Re

The scheme satisfies all statutory and jurisdictional requirements, class meetings were properly constituted and fairly represented, the scheme is fair and reasonable, and there is no legal or technical defect; therefore, the court sanctions the scheme.

Parties
Applicant: Nurtur. Group Limited; Acquirer: Growth Capital Partners LLP; Acquirer: Bidco; Investor: Tosca
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Scheme of Arrangement / Final Sanction Hearing
Outcome
scheme sanctioned
Legal Topics
Scheme of Arrangement, Share Acquisition, Class Meetings, Fairness of Scheme
Company Law Corporate Finance Scheme of Arrangement Share Acquisition Class Meetings Fairness of Scheme

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nurtur. Group Limited

Applicant

Growth Capital Partners LLP

Acquirer

Bidco

Acquirer

Tosca

Investor

Procedural Posture

Scheme of Arrangement / Final Sanction Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed scheme of arrangement satisfies jurisdictional requirements under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006
  2. 2 Whether class meetings were properly constituted and fairly represented
  3. 3 Whether the scheme is fair and reasonable to shareholders

Ratio Decidendi

The scheme satisfies all statutory and jurisdictional requirements, class meetings were properly constituted and fairly represented, the scheme is fair and reasonable, and there is no legal or technical defect; therefore, the court sanctions the scheme.

Court Disposition

scheme sanctioned

Orders

  • Scheme of Arrangement sanctioned under Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006
  • Bidco bound by the Scheme subject to satisfaction of relevant conditions