O v P & Anor
A 16-year-old with capacity is entitled to consent to medical treatment for gender dysphoria without parental or court oversight, and the court will not intervene unless there are safeguarding concerns or the provider is unregulated. The Cass Review's findings do not justify departing from established case law for minors over 16.
- Parties
- Applicant: O; 1st Respondent: P; 2nd Respondent: Q
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Interim orders discharged; proceedings ended; no declarations made.
- Legal Topics
- Consent to Medical Treatment, Gender Dysphoria, Prohibited Steps Order, Inherent Jurisdiction, Capacity of Minors, Parental Responsibility
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
O
Applicant
P
1st Respondent
Q
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a 16-year-old with capacity can consent to gender dysphoria treatment without parental or court oversight
- 2 Whether gender dysphoria treatment for minors requires special court oversight
- 3 Whether the court should make declarations regarding private clinics prescribing puberty blockers or hormones
Ratio Decidendi
A 16-year-old with capacity is entitled to consent to medical treatment for gender dysphoria without parental or court oversight, and the court will not intervene unless there are safeguarding concerns or the provider is unregulated. The Cass Review's findings do not justify departing from established case law for minors over 16.
Court Disposition
Interim orders discharged; proceedings ended; no declarations made.
Orders
- Interim prohibited steps order discharged
- Father to give undertaking not to facilitate offshore treatment for Q while a minor
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment