SO, Re [2015] EWHC 935 (Fam) (01 April 2015)
The High Court has jurisdiction to extend protective injunctions made in wardship proceedings beyond the child's 18th birthday, either under the wardship or inherent jurisdiction, where there is ongoing risk to the applicant and the protected person, even if they are habitually resident abroad and irrespective of capacity, provided the court had jurisdiction at the outset and the individuals are British nationals. The risk posed by the respondent justifies continued protection.
- Citation
- [2015] EWHC 935 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant: O; Respondent: P
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Wardship/inherent Jurisdiction Application / Judgment on Application to Extend and Amend Injunction Beyond Child's 18th Birthday
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Injunctions Beyond Majority, Protection of Vulnerable Adults, Jurisdiction Over British Nationals Abroad, Non Molestation Orders, Article 8 ECHR Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
O
Applicant
P
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Wardship/inherent Jurisdiction Application / Judgment on Application to Extend and Amend Injunction Beyond Child's 18th Birthday
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can extend an injunction made in wardship proceedings beyond the child's 18th birthday
- 2 Whether the court has inherent jurisdiction to protect a vulnerable adult in these circumstances
- 3 Whether the habitual residence of the protected persons in Australia precludes the exercise of jurisdiction by the English court
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court has jurisdiction to extend protective injunctions made in wardship proceedings beyond the child's 18th birthday, either under the wardship or inherent jurisdiction, where there is ongoing risk to the applicant and the protected person, even if they are habitually resident abroad and irrespective of capacity, provided the court had jurisdiction at the outset and the individuals are British nationals. The risk posed by the respondent justifies continued protection.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- Injunction extended beyond S's 18th birthday until further order, restraining the respondent from violence, harassment, proximity, and contact with the applicant and S;
- Non-disclosure of applicant and S's identities and addresses;
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment