Andromeda Marine SA v OW Bunker & Trading A/S

Andromeda Marine SA v OW Bunker & Trading A/S

The English court does not have jurisdiction because Andromeda was not party to the contract containing the jurisdiction clause, nor did they accept it. Article 17 of the Brussels Convention does not apply, and the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 is inapplicable. The claim for negative declaratory...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: Andromeda Marine SA; Defendant: O W Bunker & Trading A/S
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 April 2006
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Application / Ruling on Jurisdictional Challenge
Outcome
Jurisdiction declined; claim dismissed.
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction, Maritime Lien, Negative Declaratory Relief, Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause, Contracts (rights of Third Parties) Act 1999
International Commercial Law Maritime Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction Maritime Lien Negative Declaratory Relief Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause Contracts (rights of Third Parties) Act 1999

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andromeda Marine SA

Claimant

O W Bunker & Trading A/S

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Commercial Court Application / Ruling on Jurisdictional Challenge

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the English court has jurisdiction under Article 17 of the Brussels Convention
  2. 2 Whether Andromeda Marine SA is bound by the jurisdiction clause in the bunker supply contract
  3. 3 Whether Andromeda can seek negative declaratory relief in England

Ratio Decidendi

The English court does not have jurisdiction because Andromeda was not party to the contract containing the jurisdiction clause, nor did they accept it. Article 17 of the Brussels Convention does not apply, and the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 is inapplicable. The claim for negative declaratory relief should have been brought in Denmark.

Court Disposition

Jurisdiction declined; claim dismissed.

Orders

  • Court does not have jurisdiction to hear Andromeda’s claim for negative injunctive relief.
  • Claim should have been brought in Danish Courts.